Troubleshooting Slow SQL Server Machines. When troubleshooting a performance problem within a SQL Server database instance, there are a variety of places that you can look to determine its root cause. Some of the biggest performance bottlenecks usually boil down to several causes: Missing indexes Poor index design Poorly designed database schema Inadequate storage I/O subsystem Buffer pool too small Slow network Wrong technology used Resolving these problems might seem difficult, but if you have the right tools available, they can be easy enough to fix so that performance will improve. One way to easily determine if there are missing indexes is to use two dynamic management views (DMVs): sys. Between these two DMVs, you can easily identify many of the indexes that need to be created to improve performance. So, SQL Server might recommend that another entire index be created when all that's needed is a new column in the existing index. Because of this, you shouldn't just take the information from the DMVs and create all the specified indexes. The reported indexes should be compared against the indexes that already exist in the database to ensure that duplicate indexes aren't being created. Duplicate indexes can lead to additional writes, updates, and deletes, causing performance problems. This query uses the db. So, to run it in your database, simply specify that database in the Available Databases drop- down box in SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS) or add a USE statement before the query. SELECT a. avg. The higher the number, the more savings that will be seen by adding an index. The easiest way to identity these problems is to query the procedure cache because queries' execution plans remain in the cache as long as there is enough memory to store them. Here's all the changes coming to Rainbow Six Siege. Ubisoft has revealed a new update coming today for Rainbow Six Siege, tweaking lots of its operators and fixing a. Use this page to learn the basics and grab a few Tips and Tricks. Feel free to add to the tips below. UpdateStar is compatible with Windows platforms. UpdateStar has been tested to meet all of the technical requirements to be compatible with Windows 10, 8.1, Windows 8. An Advanced World: Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare takes place in a plausible future in which technological progress and today's military practices have converged with. Port Forward Network Utilities. Port Forward Network Utilities is a. The Supreme mouse controller combo Listing 2 shows a sample query that looks for queries with a high total cost. When reviewing the output from Listing 2, look at the Statement. Sub. Tree. Cost column. The higher the number, the more expensive the execution plan. SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ UNCOMMITTED; WITH XMLNAMESPACES(DEFAULT'http: //schemas. SELECTquery. However, it isn't recommended that Extended Events be used to capture execution plans in high- load systems as doing so could overload the system by 2. Another book you might want to check out is Expert Performance Indexing for SQL Server 2. APress) by Jason Strate and Ted Krueger, which is scheduled to be released in May 2. Evidence of a poorly designed database schema can be seen when lots of I/O requests occur while queries are being run. The easiest way to look for this evidence is to use SQL Server Profiler to capture the queries that have the highest I/O load, then run those queries in SSMS with SET STATISTICS IO enabled. Between the table I/O outputs and the execution plans, you'll get a good indication of which table is having a performance problem. Sadly, fixing the problem usually isn't as simple as finding the problem. The table might need to be normalized or denormalized, depending on the table's design. Or perhaps the table needs to be vertically partitioned because there's too much data in it. Conversely, maybe the vertical partitioning was taken a little too far. In case you're unfamiliar with vertical partitioning, it's a technique in which a single table is broken into multiple tables, often using a date as the breakpoint. For example, instead of putting the sales history for every year into a single table, you could put the sales history for each year into a separate table. A message about slow I/O in the ERRORLOG file is a good indicator that there's something wrong with the storage I/O subsystem. Not seeing these errors just means that your storage isn't ridiculously overtasked and not keeping up. A quick way to look for I/O problems is to download Adam Machanic's free sp. Look for wait types that report I/O as being the problem. That's because a poorly indexed database server can also report I/O problems when the I/O subsystem is perfectly sized for the application, but you're asking the I/O subsystem to do a lot more work than it should be doing. In other words, the I/O problem is actually the result of an index problem. To resolve it, you need to add indexes to the system. Because of this, whenever I look at a new system in which the client wants to upgrade the hard drives, I always start with the indexes because that might very well fix the problem. For large reporting databases, table partitioning might help. There are two different techniques that you can consider: partitioning for partition elimination and partitioning for CAPEX savings. No matter which approach is taken, a solid understanding of the data and how it's used is required. Partitioning for partition elimination. With this technique, the goal is to reduce the amount of data that SQL Server needs to scan through when doing table scans. Typically, this is done by using a static window approach with many partitions created in the system and data. For example, you could put the data for each month into its own partition. This way, when users run a query, SQL Server needs to scan through only one partition instead of going through all the data. Partitioning for CAPEX savings. With this technique, the goal is to put the most frequently used data on really fast disks, such as flash drives, and put the less frequently used data on slower, less expensive disks, such as Serial ATA (SATA) disks. This often makes flash drives a much more affordable option, because you only need a small number of them. Although this is probably the easiest solution to implement, getting management to sign off on the purchase of new hardware might not be that easy. This gives the same basic benefit as partitioning for CAPEX but without needing to dive into how the table needs to be partitioned. The storage array automatically moves the data that's most often used to the fastest disks, which leaves the stale or idle data on the slower, less- expensive disks. A small buffer pool will generally cause performance problems, because it will put too much pressure on the disk subsystem. There are a couple of different performance monitor counters that you can look at to see if the buffer pool size is healthy. Both counters are located within the SQLServer: Buffer Manager performance counter object. This counter tells you how much memory is currently allocated to the buffer pool. This counter is in pages, so to get it into gigabytes, multiply the value by 8, then divide by 1,0. This counter tells you how long, in seconds, SQL Server expects that you'll be keeping the data in memory before releasing the page so that additional data can be loaded into memory. There is no magic number that says that the buffer pool is healthy. There's a myth floating around the Internet that says a Page Life Expectancy of 3. However, this isn't the case. On a system that has 1. MB of RAM, a Page Life Expectancy of 3. However, a Page Life Expectancy of 3. GB of RAM would be a disaster. The only other way to increase the amount of data that SQL Server can load from one database into the buffer pool is to move databases from one server to another so that the remaining databases have access to a higher percentage of the database engine's buffer pool. The easiest way to identify this problem is to look at the wait statistics on the system. If the client computers are located at a remote site, this could be the cause of the ASYNC. A slow or misconfigured network port could also be the cause of ASYNC. For example, having a network port configured for 1. In addition, there could be performance problems if a network port is configured to auto- detect the network speed, but the network switch and server don't successfully negotiate the fastest possible network speed. It will require a coordinated effort between the network administrator, the network provider if there's a WAN involved, and the DBA. Usually this revolves around running large reports against production OLTP databases or databases that have an OLTP schema. Many of these reports end up doing large, complex aggregations. Although SQL Server can do the aggregations, it isn't the best technology to use for them. For large, complex aggregations, SQL Server Analysis Services (SSAS) is often the more appropriate tool because SSAS pre- aggregates the data when the databases are loaded. As a result, when a query asks for aggregated data, it has already been aggregated and the results can simply be returned instead of being processed. It could be a database design problem, system design problem, infrastructure design problem, or code problem. No matter the reason, it's important to realize that slow SQL Server database engines can have more serious consequences than just people complaining. Customers might not get their orders placed. Application users might be spending minutes instead of seconds waiting for screens to load. Users might be waiting hours instead of minutes for reports to run. All of these things will cost the company money - - and nothing will cause a company to want to get its database performance problems resolved more quickly than being able to quantify the money being lost because of slow performance.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
August 2017
Categories |